The Prieuré de Sion presents, on this platform, a genealogical reconstruction concerning what tradition describes as the bloodline of Jesus Christ. The publication of this material does not claim dogmatic authority, nor does it seek to impose a definitive historical verdict. Rather, it constitutes the result of a convergent body of research, integrating historical sources, transmitted knowledge, and genealogical analysis developed over time.
This reconstruction emerges from the intersection of documented history, oral tradition, and initiatic transmission, fields which, by their very nature, do not always overlap seamlessly. Where archival continuity is fragmentary or absent, tradition preserves elements that scholarship alone cannot fully explain; where tradition is silent or symbolic, genealogical research provides structure and coherence. The work presented here arises precisely from this dynamic interplay.
Methodological Framework
The genealogical reconstruction is based on a multi-layered methodology:
- Historical sources, including medieval chronicles, ecclesiastical records, noble genealogies, and later scholarly rediscoveries;
- Transmitted knowledge, preserved within initiatic and chivalric traditions, which have maintained continuity through symbolic language, secrecy, and lineage-based transmission;
- Genealogical research, applying recognized methods of lineage reconstruction, correlation of names, titles, territories, and succession patterns across generations.
It is important to emphasize that such a reconstruction cannot be approached with purely modern criteria of documentation alone. Many periods addressed are characterized by deliberate suppression, political erasure, or damnatio memoriae. In such contexts, continuity must be traced through indirect evidence, convergent indicators, and internal coherence rather than through uninterrupted archival chains.
Historical and Symbolic Context
Within Western tradition, the notion of a sacred lineage is neither anomalous nor marginal. From biblical genealogies to medieval concepts of sacred kingship, bloodline has long been understood not merely as biological succession, but as symbolic continuity, transmitting authority, responsibility, and spiritual vocation.
The reconstruction presented here must therefore be read on two complementary levels:
- Historical-genealogical, examining plausible lines of descent, matrimonial alliances, territorial continuity, and dynastic survival;
- Symbolic-initiatic, recognizing that lineage also functions as a vessel for memory, identity, and spiritual mission.
In this perspective, the bloodline of Jesus Christ—if preserved—would not represent a claim to power or privilege, but rather the continuation of a responsibility of guardianship, aligned with the ideals of service, humility, and inner realization emphasized throughout the chivalric and initiatic traditions.
Purpose and Scope of the Publication
The purpose of making this reconstruction publicly available is not to provoke controversy, but to document a coherent tradition of inquiry that has existed for centuries and continues to inspire historical and philosophical reflection.
Readers are invited to approach this material with discernment, intellectual rigor, and openness. The reconstruction does not demand belief; it invites examination. It does not present itself as absolute truth; it offers a structured hypothesis, grounded in converging lines of evidence and tradition.
By publishing this work, the Prieuré de Sion affirms its role as a custodian of memory and knowledge, committed to preserving and transmitting material that belongs to the broader heritage of Western spiritual history, while leaving final judgment to the conscience and intelligence of each reader.
The material presented in this section is offered for historical, genealogical, and cultural study. It reflects a reconstruction developed through the convergence of documented sources, transmitted traditions, and genealogical methodologies, and must not be understood as a statement of established or universally accepted historical fact.
The subject matter addressed—particularly where it concerns antiquity, early Christianity, and medieval dynastic continuity—inevitably involves periods characterized by fragmentary documentation, political suppression, symbolic transmission, and the loss or alteration of primary sources. As a result, absolute certainty, as defined by modern historiographical standards, cannot always be achieved.
This reconstruction therefore functions as a hypothesis supported by converging indicators, rather than as a definitive or exhaustive account. Where historical records are incomplete or ambiguous, interpretative frameworks are employed with transparency and intellectual caution.
The Prieuré de Sion does not assert doctrinal authority over the conclusions drawn, nor does it seek to impose belief. The publication of this material serves the purpose of preserving and presenting a coherent body of research and tradition that has existed in various forms across centuries, allowing scholars, researchers, and readers to examine, evaluate, and critique it independently.
Readers are encouraged to approach this content with critical discernment, awareness of methodological limitations, and respect for the distinction between historical inquiry, symbolic tradition, and personal interpretation.
- Ancestors of Mariamne la Tour du Tropeau Migdal Eder
- Ancestors of Yeshua Ben Yossef
- Descendants of Mariamne la Tour du Tropeau Migdal Eder
- Descendants of Yeshua Ben Yossef